Samenvattingen Rechtsgeleerdheid Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen

12 Reviews received

• 

  2 year ago • didiergillissen

  Hoofdlijnen Contractenrecht Verdiept (CRV) | Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen | Uitgebreid en Duidelijk | Met jurisprudentieschema en oefententamenvragen

• 

  3 year ago • markmulder1

  Hoofdlijnen Contractenrecht Verdiept (CRV) | Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen | Uitgebreid en Duidelijk | Met jurisprudentieschema en oefententamenvragen

• 

  3 year ago • tamaravanpul

  Hoofdlijnen Burgerlijk Recht II | Samenvatting | Radboud Universiteit | Hoorcolleges en Jurisprudentie

  Translated by Google

  Bright and clearly arranged. All important topics are clearly defined according to the criteria in force.

  Translated by Google
  

  By: twan13 • 3 year ago

  Hi Tamara, thank you so much for your review! Good luck with your exam!

• 

  3 year ago • sennatrap

  Hoofdlijnen Burgerlijk Recht II | Samenvatting | Radboud Universiteit | Hoorcolleges en Jurisprudentie

  

  By: twan13 • 3 year ago

  Hi Senna, First of all, thank you for your review. So far I have only had positive reactions to this summary on Stuvia and outside Stuvia. Several students found it a very nice tool when studying for the exam. I would like to hear why you rated this summary with 2 out of 5 stars.

  

  By: twan13 • 3 year ago

  Hi, Senna. I haven't read anything from you yet. Since you have placed a rating of 2 out of 5 stars, I would like to hear the reason. If I don't know the reason, I'm afraid I can't do anything with your assessment.

  

  By: twan13 • 3 year ago

  I see that you have also posted a 'summary' for this course. If you only gave this review to sell more yourself, I ask you to delete the review yourself. If this is not the case I would still like to hear why you gave 2 stars.

  

  By: sennatrap • 3 year ago

  Hi Twan, that is of course not the reason why I gave this review. I had already seen the reaction, but due to crowds I hadn't had the time to give a reason for this review, which you (hopefully) will benefit too.

  

  By: sennatrap • 3 year ago

  The description says that it is a clear and comprehensive summary, but this is not how I experienced it. More specifically, I found the summary in a number of areas not clear (sometimes looks messy), does not deal with a number of (mandatory) topics and gives me little insight into the substance.

  

  By: sennatrap • 3 year ago

  Since it is not what I expected, I gave the summary 2 stars

  

  By: twan13 • 3 year ago

  Thank you for your comment! Too bad you didn't experience the summary as pleasant. I have chosen not to make the summary too long, because it is a summary. In addition, I personally find a classification by subject very pleasant. Of course, this is always subjective.

  

  By: twan13 • 3 year ago

  Reply deleted by the user

  

  By: twan13 • 3 year ago

  Reply deleted by the user

  

  By: twan13 • 3 year ago

  I've increased the number of sample pages so students can see if the structure of the summary fits them. In addition, I deliberately chose to work with colors and underlines to make the most important points visible at a glance. Finally, I would point out that it is the 'main lines' of the fabric (made in 2019).

  

  By: twan13 • 3 year ago

  Good luck studying, hopefully you still benefit from the summary despite your other expectations!

• 

  4 year ago • mnksmit

  Hoofdlijnen Europees Economisch Recht | Overzichtelijk & Duidelijk | Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen

+  Show more reviews